|
| |
INDO
- ISLAMIC ARCHITECTURE
Indo-Islamic
architecture begins with the Ghurid occupation of India at the
close of the 12 century A.D. The Muslims having inherited a wealth
of varied designs from Sassanian and Byzantine empires and being
naturally endowed with good taste for buildings, never failed to
adapt to their own requirements the indigenous architecture of
almost every foreign country that they conquered.
The
most important factors common to both forms of architecture, especially
in respect of mosques and temples, were that to both styles, ornamental
decoration was very vital and that the open court in many cases
was surrounded by colonnades. But the contrast was equally striking:
the prayer chamber of the mosque was spacious, whereas the shrine
of the temple was comparatively small. The mosque was light and
open, whereas the temple was dark and closed. The difference between
the lay-out of a temple and a mosque is explained by the essential
difference between the Hindu and Muslim forms of worship and prayer.
A cell to house the image of the deity, garbha-griha,
and often small halls in front for the worshippers was regarded
adequate for a simple Hindu temple. But the Islamic form of worship,
with its emphasis on congregational prayer, requires a spacious
courtyard with a large prayer hall, pointed towards Mecca, as its
western end that is, to the West of India. In the rear wall of
the prayer-hall, the centre is occupied by a recess or alcove,
called mihrab; and indicates the direction of prayer (quibla). A
pulpit (mimber) at its right is meant for the imam who leads the
prayer. A tower or minaret, originally intended for the muazzin to
call the faithful to the prayer, later assumed a mere architectural
character. A gallery or compartment of the prayer hall or some
other part was screened off to accommodate the ladies who observed purdah. The
main entrance to a mosque is on the east, and the sides are enclosed
by cloisters (liwans). A tank is provided for ablutions
usually in the courtyard of a mosque. |

Lion capital from Ashoka Stambha,
Stone, Sarnath, Uttar Pradesh |
|
|
| |
|

|
Arches, Qutub Complex, Delhi
|
|
You
would have observed that this style of construction incorporated not
only certain new modes and principles but reflected also the religious
and social needs of the Muslims. The Muslim style of construction was
based on arches, vaults and domes, on columns and pyramidal towers
or slender spires, called trabeate.
In
the Hindu style of construction spaces were spanned corbels, held
together by making courses project, each further than the one below,
so that the open span was gradually reduced to a size which could
be covered with a single slab or brick. Although there exists some
evidence to suggest that the true arch may have been known in India
earlier, it is the Muslims who are believed to have brought the principle
of building a true arch so as to hold up the roof or ceiling or a
top part of a structure, the bricks or stones laid to reproduce a
curve, held together by the key-stone on the top of the rise. In
many cases even if the true arch was familiar to indigenous architects
in ancient times, it was re-introduced by the Muslims. The result
was that flat lintels or corbelled ceilings were replaced by arches
or vaults, and the pyramidal roof or spire by the dome. The necessity
of raising a round dome over a square construction introduced multiplication
of sides and angles by providing squinches so that a base with many
sides usually 16, could be obtained to raise a circular drum for
the dome. A sunshade or balcony was laid on cantilever brackets
fixed into the projection from the walls, which introduced the chajja (caves
or sunshade). The practice of the burial of the dead, as distinct
from the cremation practised by the Hindus, chamber, a mihrab in
the western wall and the real grave (qabr) in an underground chamber.
In larger and more complex tombs, there is also a mosque, and well
planned garden. The mode, theme or motifs or ornamentation employed
in Islamic buildings also made a departure from the earlier vogues.
The Hindu style or ornamentation is largely naturalistic showing
human and animal forms and the luxuriant vegetation life. As among
the Muslims the representation of living beings was taboo by way
of decoration or ornamentation, they introduced geometrical and arabesque
patterns, ornamental writing and formal representation of plant and
floral life. In short the contribution of the Muslims to Indo-Muslim
architecture is profound and no less interesting. Among the architectural
features introduced by them mention may be made of arches, domes, minars and
minarets, the pendentive, squinch arch, half domed double portals,
kiosks (chhatris) and the use of concrete as a factor of
construction. They also introduced gilding and painting in varied
colours and designs. Muslim decorative elements are usually of the
nature of embroidery. Even though lime was known and to certain extent
used in construction work in India fairly early, mud was generally
used for brick work and large blocks of stones were laid one on top
of the other and held by means of iron clamps. The Muslims, like
the Romans, were also responsible for making extensive use of concrete
and lime mortar as an important factor of construction and incidentally
used lime as plaster and a base for decoration which was incised
into it and held enamel work on tiles.
|
| |
As
the first - Muslim invaders of India were merely armed horsemen who
had come into the country to loot and plunder and not think in terms
of founding towns, cities or empires. Consequently they did not bring
with them architects or masons. The building material obtained from
the destruction of other buildings was used for new improvised buildings
such as Quwwatul-Islam Mosque in Delhi and the Adhai din-ka-Jhonpra
at Ajmer. The advent of the Muslims in India therefore did not immediately
make a great impact on Indian architecture and as the physical conquest
of India actually took more than a thousand years it was only with
the conquest of India by Emperor Babar in 1526 that the Muslims began
to think in terms of settling down in the country and in course of
time had the satisfaction that they now belonged to the country and
that the country belonged to them. As such from the 7th century to
the 16th century Muslim architecture in India reflects the unsettled
condition of the conquerers who felt that they were living amidst the
conquered inhabitants, many of who were hostile to them. As such the
accent thus far was on security which could be had only in walled fortifIcations.
It is, therefore, that early Muslim towns and cities, even when they
are tombs were made as fortified places which they could easily defend
against hostile forces.
The
Quwwat-ul-Islam Mosque was constructed by Qutub-ud-din Aibak around
1197 A.D. and as is very clear from inscriptions he demolished 27
Hindu and Jain temples within the Rajput citadel of Lalkot as well
as the Quila-Rai Pithora and that their carved columns, lintels,
ceiling slabs, all showing Hindu gods and goddesses, Purnaghatas
and temple bells handing by chains, were utilised to construct the
mosque known as the Might of Islam". The massive stone screen
with five graceful arches, the central one being the highest, not
built on the true arch principle with voussoirs and key-stone, but
by corbelling the successive courses (a system known to Indian masons
for over 2,000 years) it is a trabeate construction, with lintels
holding up the top and the arch only an ornamental false element.
As the entire work was carried out by native Indian craftsmen, the
ornamentation of the screens show typical Hindu decorative floral
elements, serpentine tendrils and undulating leaves. The only new
element that was introduced by the Muslims is the Arabic inscription.
In front may also be seen the Iron pillar, 7.20 metres high and 32
cm. to 42 cm. in circumference. An inscription on it, engraved in
characters of the 4th century A.D. proclaims it to be Garudarwaja, the
lofty named Chandra believed to be none else than Chandragupta II
Vikramaditya. Even though this pillar has been standing there for
over 1600 years it has not been corroded by rust and is a standing
testimony of the metallurgical skill of its manufacturers.
|

|
Adhai din-ka-jhonpra, Ajmer, Rajasthan
|
|

|
Qutub Minar, Delhi
|
|
The
Qutub Minar of Mehrauli was built around 1199 by Qutub-ud-din and finally
completed by his son-in-law and successor IItutmish (1210-35). In one
sense this tower was raised in adjunct to the mosque to allow the mulah to
call the faithful to prayer: it could also be a tower of victory, not
unlike some erected by Hindu rulers. Originally the minar had four
storeys, the uppermost of which was damaged by lightning in 1373. Feroz
Shah Tughlaq (1351- 88) rebuilt its two storeys. With its projecting
balconies, carved with decorated elements on the underside, inscriptional
surface carving and variegated fluting, this 72.5 m. high minar with
399 steps, is the highest stone tower in India.
Another
early mosque, is the well known Adhai-din-ka-Jhonpra at Ajmer which
was also constructed from the material obtained after demolishing
Hindu temples. This one is also laid on the same plan as the Delhi
mosque constructed by Qutub-ud-din, with carved pillars used in colonnades.
The
Sultan Ghari tomb is situated 4 miles west of the Qutub and is the
ftrst example of a monumental Muslim tomb in India. It stands like
a fortress within a walled enclosure with bastions on the comers,
with its octagonal grave chamber underground. This also has a number
of stone pillars, carved lintels and other pieces originally used
in temples, re-utilised here by chipping off the Hindu decorative
elements.
The
Alai-Darwaza was, built by Allaudin Khilji by enlarging the Quwwat-ul-Islam
Mosque's enclosures of colonnades and providing them two gateways.
In this and other buildings constructed by the Khiljis, the true
arch in the form of a pointed horseshoe, broad dome, recessed arches
under the squinch, perforated windows, inscriptional bands and use
of red sandstone relieved by marble are features characteristic of
Khilji architecture.
|
| |
The
buildings constructed in Delhi by the Tughlaqs such as the fortified
town of Tughlaqabad - look solid, surrounded, as they are, with
bastions, thick and sloping walls, even in the case of tomb of Ghiyas-ud-din
Tughlaq, making them into fortified strongholds set in the middle of
a moat, to make them unassailable. The buildings have plain and austere
surfaces of grey stone, cross vaults over large halls, battered wall
of enormous thickness, secret passage and hidden exits, everything
built with an eye on defence. To a certain extent the Hindu trabeated
construction is still used; there are false arches and the dome is
a typical importation from Syria and Byzantine.
From
the Khilji and Tughlaq styles discussed earlier ultimately many of
the Islamic tombs evolved through the next century or so, characterised
by elegant verandahs consisting of multiplication of arches and a
high tomb, derived and imported from western countries. In the course
of these centuries the battlement motifs (Kangura) became a mere
decorative element motif having outlined its utility as a defensive
architectural member. There was gradually a harmonious blending between
the Hindu and Muslim architectural styles and this new style of architecture
is known as Indo-Islamic. It is entirely different in character from
Muslim architecture in other countries, incorporating the best of
both Hindu and ,Muslim styles, freely using Hindu brackets in an
arcuate construction with a dome, with the difference that the Muslim
dome now acquired a lotus design under its ftnial.
It
was in this direction that the Indo-Islamic Architecture now began
to evolve, adding to it the local flavour of the provisional kingdom
of Bengal, Gujarat, Jaunpur, Golconda, Malwa and the Deccan.
|

|
Fort of Ghiyas-ud-din Tughlaq, Tughlaqabad, Delhi
|
|

|
Jali Work, Sidi Sayyid Mosque, Ahmedabad, Gujarat
|
|
The
Islamic monuments of Bengal are not much different from such buildings
elsewhere in plan and in design, but the use of a different building
material and the execution of details inspired by local traditions
have made them quite distinct. The so-called "Bengal" roof
with sloping cornices, which originated from the bamboo-construction,
was adopted by the Muslims and later it spread widely, even in other
regions. Brick was the chief building material in the alluvial plains
of Bengal from early times and remains so even now, the use of stone
being limited largely to pillars which were mainly obtained from demolished
temples. The pillars in Bengal, even when constructed with brick, are
generally short and square and the opening is usually accurate, for
trabeate construction normally called for the use of stone. Covered
brick and glazed tiles were usually pressed into service for decoration.
At
Gaur the earliest building representing the constructional and ornamental
methods of this style, is the Dakhil Darwaja built by Barbak Shah
(1959-74) as a ceremonial gateway in front of the citadel. With a
tall arched entrance between vertical pylons on either side and tapering
towers on the corners, it is an imposing structure.
The
walls of Sidi Said Mosque, Ahmedabad, built in 1572 consist substantially
of perforated screens. It has become world famous on account of perforated
screens, some of them representing the "palm and parasite" motif,
which occurs also in the Darsbari Masjid in Bengal. It has the delicate
quality of filigree work.
|
| |
The
Gol Gumbad of Bijapur is the mausoleum of Muhammad Adil Shah (1627-57).
It is the largest dome cubicle in the world covering a total interior
surface of over 1600 sq. metres. Architecturally it is a simple construction,
its underground vaults consisting of a square grave chamber and a large
single square chamber above ground. The large hemispherical dome surmounting
it and then seven storeyed octagonal towers on its corners lend it
a unique appearance. Each of its walls on the outside is divided into
three recessed arches, the central one panelled, with a running bracket
- supported Chhajja at the cornice. A 3.4 m. wide gallery
rests on its interior at the level of the drum. It is known as the
whispering gallery, as even a whisper here reverberates as an echo
under the dome. The large dome is hemispherical but is covered with
a row of petals at the base.
With
advent of the Mughals, Indo-Muslim architecture got a blood transfusion
as it were, architectural activity having declined significantly
during the role of the Lodis. The Mughals were quick to realise that
they could not hope to establish a lasting empire in India unless
they took within their fold, mixed and mingled with the local population,
especially the Rajput princess of Rajasthan. From being merely satisfied
with establishing and somehow safeguarding their Sultanates as in
the case of the Delhi Sultans, thinking themselves to be the conquerors,
keeping aloof from their subjects and thus creating a wide gulf between
themselves and the people of the country that they had the good fortune
to rule, the Mughals turned deliberately towards conciliation and
pacification of the Hindus. Akbar, did everything possible to live
in peace and amity with his Hindu subjects. His policy of conciliation,
his open admiration of Hindu culture and his unorthodox ways as the
creator of a new eclectic religion, the Din-i-illahi, are reflected
in architecture. Jahangir was half Hindu by blood, his mother, Jodhabai,
being a Rajput princess. Shahjahan too continued this policy of tolerance
and respect for the Hindus. The Mughal empire, as well as Mughal
architecture, flourished and rose to great heights under their benign
rule, but all this ended abruptly under the last of the great Mughals,
Aurangzeb, a puritanic Muslim, who tried to put the clock back and
in this process stopped it and broke it by trying to reverse the
entire conciliatory policy of his ancestors. He looked upon art,
music, dance, painting and even architecture as an evil born of worldly
desire and therefore there was an abrupt decline and eventual downfall
in aesthetic appreciation and architectural enterprise.
|

|
Golgombaz, Bijapur, Karnataka
|
|

|
Humayun Darwaza, Purana Qila, Delhi
|
|
Babar,
the founder of the Mughal empire, was a man of culture and exceptional
aesthetic taste. For 4 years he ruled in India most of his time was
spent in war. However, he was fond of formal gardens and a couple of
gardens are ascribed to him. No architecture worthy of note was made
during his times except perhaps a couple of mosques.
After
Babar's death, his son, Humayun, succeeded him but he was driven
out of India by Sher Shah Suri and after taking asylum in Iran, he
eventually returned and overthrew Sikander Shah Sur, and regained
his throne.
To the Surs
is ascribed, the tombs at Sasaram, in Bihar including Sher Shah's own
tomb, which was made by moderating the Lodi octagonal pattern with a
verandah around it, each side pierced by arches and the halls surmounted
by a large and wide dome. The Surs made use of red and dark grey stone
latticed screens, decorative turrets, painted ceilings and coloured tiles.
The Purana Qila
and the Quila Kohna Masjid inside, are also ascribed to Sher Shah
Suri. The walls of the Purana Quila are made of enormous half fashioned
stones, with strong and thick walls, ornamentation and decoration
are minimal. |
| |
The
first distinct example of proper Mughal architecture inspired by Persian
architecture, is the tomb of Humayun, in Delhi, built by his widow,
Begha Begum. This tomb is important for a proper study of the development
of later Mughal architecture and has provided the prototype, followed
by architects who designed the Mausoleum of Jahangir at Shahdara, Lahore,
as well as the celebrated Taj Mahal, at Agra. Although Sikander Lodi's
tomb as the first garden tomb built in India, it is Humayun's tomb
which strikes a new note. It is a memorial erected by a devoted wife
for her imperial husband and is magnificent, grand and impressive.
Raised on a vast platform, the tomb proper stands in the centre of
a square garden, divided into 4 main parts by causeways (Charbagh)
in the centre of which ran shallow water-channels. The square, red,
sandstone, double storeyed structure of the mausoleum rises over a
high square terrace, raised over a series of cells which are like a
musical composition. The octagonal form of the central chamber containing
the cenotaph, is inspired by Syrian and earlier Islamic models. It
is for the first time that pink sandstone and white are used with admirable
effect, the white is used cleverly to emphasise, surround and underline
doors and windows, strengthening the design.
There
is a certain rhythmic quality in the whole structure in its symmetrical
design and the repetition of the large dome in the similar pavillions
with small but similar domes. The mausoleum is a synthesis of Persian
architecture and Indian traditions, in the arched alcoves, corridors
and a high double dome as well as the kiosks (chhatris) which
give it a pyramidal shape from a distance. The tomb stands as a loving
creation of a devoted wife for a great emperor, an intrepid warrior
and a strong man and is in character, solid and massive.
|

|
Humayun's Tomb, Delhi
|
|

|
Amar Singh Gate, Agra Fort,
Uttar Pradesh
|
|
Akbar
was keenly interested in art and architecture and his architecture
is a happy blend of the Hindu and Islamic modes of construction ornamentation.
Akbar's seat of Government was Agra, it is there on the banks of the
river Yamuna, that he started the construction of his famous Fort,
made of red sand-stone, which was begun in 1565 and completed in 1574.
This was the first time that depressed stone was used, also in the
ramparts. With its high walls of neat sandstone facing the gateways,
flanked by bastions, large halls, palaces, mosques, bazars, baths,
gardens and houses for courtiers and noblemen, the fort at Agra laid
a pattern in the construction of royal citadels that became a model
for later ones. The Akbari Mahal and the buildings, along with the
great and original city of Fatehpur Sikri, are made of red sandstone
with trabeated construction and restricted ornamentation. The jambs,
brackets, corbels and lintels of the doorways of the Jahangiri Mahal
together with a Chajja above the doorways are profusely sculptured.
Fatehpur
Sikri was a town planned as an administrative unit consisting of
public buildings as well as private residence in close proximity.
The city of Fatehpur Sikri was founded as a token of gratitude to
Sheikh Salim Chisti who had foretold that Akbar would have three
sons who would survive after the sad demise of many children in infancy.
The
city was begun in 1569 and completed in 1574, the same year in which
the fort at Agra was completed. The city is a modest and compact
township, consisting of halls, palaces, offices, gardens, pleasure-resorts,
baths, mosques, tombs, all of them little gems of architecture, making
a town of great nobility. Almost all the structures are based on
trabeate construction.
|
| |
The
most typical and the most well known building is Panch Mahal, the highest
and the most impressive structure, called the palace of five storeys.
It is based on the Hindu system of trabeate structure, consisting of
pillar, architrave, and brackets, with the only exception of the topmost
domed pavilion, purposefully thrown out of the centre that crowns the
entire building. The tower was perhaps used for recreation by the emperor
and members of the royal household. The idea behind this impressive
structure of diminishing storeys, one on top of the other, consisting
of open, terraces in front of the covered areas, was comfort, shade
and airy open pillared verandahs provided by perforated railings, constructed
with an eye to providing shade and fresh air, to the inhabitants seated
on the cool floors.
The
Diwan-i-Khas or Hall of Private Audience, is of a unique design.
It is a square chamber with three openings on each side and a richly
carved column in the centre supporting a magnificent flower shaped
capital. Thorough ventilation is provided by placing on all sides
perforated windows opposite each other on every wall. The charming
balcony supported by a circular top capital, runs round the halls
whole length of the 4 sides on the first floor level, supported by
brackets. It is believed that the central place was occupied by the
Emperor's throne while his Ministers sat at the corners or on the
peripheral passage.
The
Turkish Sultana's house consists of a small chamber surrounded by
a verandah. It is beautifully carved both on the outside and inside;
particularly remarkable being the wide dado carved with panels, portraying
jungle scenes with animals, birds and trees. It is the most ornamented
building in a "gigantic jewel casket" says Fergusson.
|

|
Panch Mahal, Fatehpur Sikri, Agra, Uttar Pradesh
|
|

|
Buland Darwaza, Fatehpur Sikri,
Uttar Pradesh
|
|
The
Jama Masjid at Fatehpur Sikri, besides being very large and imposing,
has also a high gateway on the south side called Buland Darwaja, which
was added after Akbar's victory over the Deccan. It is a semi-octagonal
projection, containing a high arched alcove, and is perhaps the highest
and the most imposing gateway in India.
Only
one building at Fatehpur Sikri is built of white marble, the tomb
of Sheikh Salim Chisti, Akbar's spiritual preceptor. It is a square
chamber, having a screened verandah, containing latticed panels of
exquisite design, and is an elegant structure. Besides completing
Akbar's tomb at Sikandara, and also constructing the Musamman Burj,
a double storeyed pavilion on the Agra fort, with beautiful inlay,
Jahangir's queen, Nur Jahan, built the most important building in
Agra the tomb of Itmad-ud-Daula, her father and the Prime Minister
of Jahangir, by name Mirza Ghiyas Baig. It stands within a garden
and consists of a square building with a grave chamber surrounded
by verandahs. On the upper storey there is a pavilion with rectangular
dome and screens enclosing the false grave of Itmad-ud-Daula and
his wife. The structure is built of white marble and is richly decorated
with delicate inlay work and painting containing the characteristic
Persian motifs such as cypress trees, vases fruits, winecups,
etc. The minarets on the four corners, and the fine lattice work,
traceries and inlay are in many ways, precursors of similar decorations
later on perfected and employed in the Taj Mahal.
Shahjahan
was the greatest builder of the Mughal dynasty and with him architecture
was a passion. He looked upon white marble, expensive and splendid,
as the right and proper building material for an emperor of Hindustan.
By this time the Mughal artistic tradition had matured and refined
to a great extent. It was during Shahjahan's time that there was
the highest efflorescence of Mughal architecture in India. As against
the sturdy, robust and plain construction of Akbar, Shahjahan's buildings
are highly sensuous, delicate and feminine. Instead of the earlier
simple relief work in red sandstone used by Akbar, Shahjahan's buildings
are full of delicate carvings in marble, almost like filigree and
inlay with pietra dura work. The arch became foliated, the dome became
bulbous with a constricted neck and pillars raised with shafts capitals.
He even demolished some of Akbar's simple pink sandstone structures
in the Agra Fort and replaced them with more luxurious looking, magnificent
marble building.
|
| |
Besides
constructing a number of elegant, lavishly decorated buildings, such
as Khas Mahal, Diwan-i-Khas, Moti Masjid, as well as the Jama Masjid
in Delhi, Shahjahan erected the most romantic and fabulous building,
the Taj Mahal, the tomb of his beloved wife, AIjumand Bano Begum entitled
Mumtaz Mahal. It is a dream in marble and is the logical culmination
of the conception of a garden tomb, starting with Humayun's tomb at
Delhi. The Taj is a square tomb built on a raised terrace, with graceful
tall minarets at its four comers. As in Humayun's tomb, the tomb chamber
is octagonal, with subsidiary chambers at the angles and the tomb is
surmounted by a graceful double dome. The doorway is narrower and loftier,
the dome is much more soaring. The dome has acquired a lotus pattern
below with the finial. The Taj is noted for its ethereal and dreamlike
lightness, graceful proportions and a harmonious balance between architecture
and ornamentation. There is profuse carving and beautiful inlay work
with precious multicolour stones in its floral and arabesque pattern,
fme borders, inscriptions in black marble, delicate traceries and trellis
work executed against the background of white marble. In its dreamlike
airy lightness as well as in its precious inlay work, the feminine
character is apparent, like the lovely lady in whose memory it was
built, gentle, sweet and yielding. Like Humayun's tomb it was laid
in a charbagh, or gardens with water channels and full of
flowers.
In
1638 Shahjahan shifted his capital from Agra to Delhi and laid the
foundation of Shahjanabad, the Seventh City of Delhi, containing
his famous citadel, the Red-Fort, which was begun in 1639 and completed
after 9 years. The Red Fort is an irregular octagon, well planned,
with its walls, gates, and a few other structures constructed in
red sandstone, and marble used for the palaces. It consists of a
Diwan-i-Am, containing the marble canopy ornamented with beautiful
panels of pietra dura work showing a few paintings. Diwan-i-Khas
is a high ornamented pillared hall, with a flat ceiling supported
on engraved arches. Its pillars contain pietra dura ornamentation
and the upper portion was originally gilded and painted. It is also
said that its marble dais once supported the famous Peacock Throne.
|

|
Taj Mahal, Agra, Uttar Pradesh
|
|

|
Jali work, Khas Mahal, Red Fort, Delhi
|
|
The
exquisite marble screen containing a representation of the scales of
justice and on the walls of this marble palace are Persian couplets,
detailing the dates of the construction of the fort, the cost of construction
and also the famous couplet claiming that "If there be a paradise
on earth it is this, it is this, it is this".
The
luxury and love of constructing magnificent buildings, patronised
by Jahangir and Shahjahan came to an end rather abruptly with the
last of the great Mughals, Emperor Aurangzeb.
Not
many palaces of early Hindu rulers of medieval time have survived.
Certain feature which characterise the Islamic construction were
not coromed merely to Muslim forts, palaces, mosques and tombs, but
were also incorporated by the Hindus, who made use of some of the
indigenous features, and planned their building to suit their customs
and ways of living.
Rajasthan
is rich in such palaces. The palaces built during the Mughal time
may be different from each other in plan, but they have certain common
architectural features, such as balconies supported on carved brackets,
pillared kiosks crowned by domes, arcades of sunk arches, foliated
arches, latticed screens, curved Bengal roofs and flat domes rising
from a rectangular base. Situated as these palaces often are on rocky
heights, they look very impressive such as those at Amber: Jaipur,
Bikaner, Jodhpur, Udaipur, Jaisalmer, etc.
|
| |
The
Kirtistambha, or Tower of Fame, was constructed by the Solanki ruler
of Gujarat and one such is that of the Chittor Fort, the capital of
Mewar before Udaipur. The tower, was constructed in the eight years
following 1440 and restored in 1906 to commemorate the building of
the Kumbhaswami Vaishnava temple, consecrated in 1440.
Of
many "experimental" works, in which the Hindu and the Islamic
traditions had combined to create something novel is the interesting
example of the 'Hava Mahal' (the Palace of the Wind) at Jaipur. Here
an extraordinary experiment has been made to create a building suited
to the hot, dry climate of Rajasthan, by making the entire facade
a perforated screen by creating over fifty slightly raised pavillions,
each a half oriel window, as it were, to allow little breeze to waft
through those hundreds of perforated jali windows. These half raised
pavilions are covered by little domes and curvilinear roofs, whilst
the openings are arch-shaped. These are probably inspired by the
tiers of small shikharas rising one above the other, of Bhubaneswar
or Tanjore.
|

|
Victory Tower, Chittorgargh Fort, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan
|
|
|
Hawa Mahal, Jaipur, Rajasthan |
|
Under
the aegis of Ministry
of Culture,
Government of India
15-A, Sector - 7, Pappankalan, Dwarka,
New Delhi - 110075 |
Centre for Cultural Resources and Training |
Telephone:(011)
25088638,
47151000
Fax: 91-11-25088637,
Gram: CENCULT
E-mail:- dg.ccrt@nic.in |
|
| |
|